| | List |
| Subject: | Re: Are we heading back to full frame digital? |
| Poster: | PaulRubinhttp://phr.cx@NOSPAM.invalid |
| Date: | 25 Feb 2007 09:30:06 -0800 |
| Related Postings: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 |
"Neil Harrington" writes:
> > What makes you think that? Compare the cost of the 300/4 for 35mm
> > with the 300/9 for 4x5. They have the same FL and are in the same
> > price range, but the large format version is over 2 stops slower.
> It has to cover about 14 times the area!
So where is the 300/2.8 for 645? It only has to cover 3x the area of
35mm.
|