Paul Rubin wrote:
> "David J Taylor"
> writes:
>> With respect, I don't think that comparing 35mm and 4x5-inch lenses
>> is the same as comparing 35mm and DX lenses. Only twice the area
>> means only 1.4x the linear coverage, which a telephoto lens may
>> provide already.
>
> Try 645 vs 35mm then, 645 having 3x the area.
Even 3X the area is still greater than 1.7 in linear dimension. Nearer,
though. How do lenses of around 400mm focal length compare?
David
|