Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
>>> [snip]
>> How many of you actually make large prints of your photos (at least 16" x
>> 20"), or you just blow it up on your computer screen?
>
> I make quite a few 13 x 19s. Does that count?
If you ask me? No. Anything smaller than 16x20 is small ;-)
> > [snip]
> Obviously, it's not just how large you print the image, but also whether you
> might be cropping fairly strongly.
I feel that many people spend a lot of money buying top-notch, expensive
cameras and lenses, But they never ever print any large prints that need
the performance of those top-notch tools. It's like buying a Farrari but
only driving it at 30 mph.
Anyway, what I'd like to know is whether you guys agree with this statement:
"Testing hundreds of digital cameras, we've found that you can only tell
just so much about a camera's image quality by viewing its images
on-screen. Ultimately, there's no substitute for printing a lot of
images and examining them closely."
You can find the above from reviews of www.imaging-resource.com
Agree, disagree?